Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Verbal Aspect

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Isaac Fried <if AT math.bu.edu>
  • To: Vadim Cherny <VadimCherny AT mail.ru>
  • Cc: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Verbal Aspect
  • Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:14:35 -0400

Vadim,

In "broken English" yet perfectly wholesome Hebrew Leviticus 1:1 reads: "Then he speak to Moshe, then he talk to him, God, out of he tent of Moed, to say." Your insistence that the WA of WAYIQTAL be translated, or rather rendered, "and" is arbitrary. In my humble opinion WAYIQTAL = then+he+QTL. Seeing the YIQTAL part of WAYIQTAL as a "future tense verb" is in my (still) humble opinion a perceptional fallacy.

Isaac Fried, Boston University

On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:22 AM, Vadim Cherny wrote:

Isaac,

I argue that wayyiqtols represent deictic center shift and should generally
be read, "and + future tense verb." I listed several arguments to that end
in the previous discussion. Also note the historical absence of wayyiqtols:
Hexapla doesn't differentiate wayyiqtols from weyiqtols.
The narrator immerses himself into the events, pauses, his deictic center
shifts, and the related events are in the future for him. He thus employs
future tense. Such usage of future tense is extremely common in old Russian
and sounds completely natural to me. In fact, that's how I've always read
the Tanakh and encountered no semantic problem whatsoever.

Lev1:1 could be strictly translated in broken English, "And he will call".
The narrator is immersed into the events, pauses before starting the
recital, and the divine words are in the future from his shifted deictic
center. Again, there is an issue of linguistic mentality. I imagine it is
hard for native English and German speakers to comprehend such flexibility
of deictic center, but such shifts are perfectly ok in Russian.

Vadim Cherny


I would translate VAYIKRA of Lev. 1:1 as "Then he called". The verse
contains no definite articles, and "Lord" is only fifth in line. It
is also not clear to me where you got this alien "would".
Isaac Fried, Boston University

On Mar 19, 2007, at 8:26 AM, Vadim Cherny wrote:


On 18/03/2007 16:55, Vadim Cherny wrote:
...
Regarding wayiqtols, would you agree that no evidence contradicts
understanding them as "and + future tense" with deictic center
shifts?

Well, on this hypothesis it is difficult to explain the WAYYIQTOLs at
the beginning of the books WAYYIQRA' = Leviticus and WAYDABBER =
Numbers, and several others if I remember correctly, including
Jonah and
Ruth which cannot plausibly be understood as continuations of other
books.

It is interesting how linguistic conventions affect perception of
text. I
have always found it difficult to follow the English a/the articles.
In your example, however, as a Russian speaker, I find wayiqtol
completely
natural.
Thus, in Lev1:1, "And the Lord would call unto Moses". The narrator
took a
stylo, paused, immersed himself in the events, and started in the
future
tense.

And then there certainly are cases where WAYYIQTOL is not
strictly sequential.

I didn't see them and would appreciate examples.
So I think you will find it hard to show that
WAYYIQTOL is always relative future. A more plausible suggestion
would
be that the regular use of this form in narrative originated in cases
where there was a clearly defined prior deictic centre, and use of
the
form was then generalised to include cases where the deictic
centre has
not been clearly set up. In other words, WAYYIQTOL might have
started as
a relative future tense, but later shifted to be a simple narrative
tense in fact used at least primarily in the past.

That's a reasonable suggestion, and I also advance it in the expanded
version of the hypothesis. But it critically depends on the
discovery of
wayiqtols in documents which clearly lack the deictic center
shifts, as the
commercial papyri.

But this does not explain apocopation

Apocopation is, in my opinion, a purely phonetic issue. When the
accent
shifts onto the first syllable, the unaccented final vowel is lost.

Vadim Cherny

_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page