Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Genesis 2:15 and 2:17 is garden feminine?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Steve Miller" <smille10 AT sbcglobal.net>
  • To: "'b-hebrew'" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Genesis 2:15 and 2:17 is garden feminine?
  • Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:09:44 -0500


> From: Yigal Levin Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 1:04 AM
>
> Yes Kenneth, the noun "gan" in verse 15 is feminine, so theoretically the
> object of "mot tamut" at the end of verse 17 COULD be the garden. However,
> from a contextual point of view this is a stretch: the object of verse 16
> is
> the man, and verse 17 is a direct extention of verse 16. If the author had
> intended that the garden would die, he would have said so specifically.
> Besides, where in scripture is a garden (or any plant) ever refered to as
> "dying"?
>
Additionally, the garden did not die in the day Adam ate off the tree of
knowledge. Gen 3:22-24
-Steve Miller
Detroit





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page