Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Seth Knorr <ftbaccounts AT yahoo.com>]

Karl, 
   
  I to believe that Christ fulfilled all six purposes on the cross. However, 
there are many scholars that assert that these purpose do not need to all be 
fulfilled inside the seventy weeks. I wanted to verify if there was any 
validity at all to this view, in view of the context and text used in the 
passage.
   
  Regards,
   
  Seth Knorr
  

K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com> wrote:
  Seth:

It can be argued that Jesus fulfilled all these requirements. To
reiterate, "to restrain (the same word as to put in prison) the rebel,
to seal up (as a seal on a letter) errors, to cover (often used as a
synonym for forgiveness) perversion, to cause to come the just one of
eons, to seal up (again as on a letter, as if to say that it is
finished) vision and prophecy, and to anoint the set apart (one) of
the set aparts." Depending on your theology, you could say that Jesus
fulfilled all of these with his death on the cross and resurrection.

Yet the destruction of Jerusalem is mentioned at the end of the
seventy sevens, implying that this is not the end of the world.

Karl W. Randolph.

On 10/20/06, Seth Knorr wrote:
> Would it violate the text of Daniel 9:24 to state that all 6 purposes that 
> where determined could be fulfilled outside the scope of the seventy 
> sevens/weeks? ie. A purpose could be fulfilled after the seventy weeks, 
> without violating the text and context.
>
> Regards,
>
> Seth Knorr
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew


                
---------------------------------
 All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done 
faster.
>From kwrandolph AT gmail.com  Fri Oct 20 21:52:43 2006
Return-Path: <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.232])
        by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958724C00D
        for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:52:43 -0400 
(EDT)
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id t10so1153540wxc
        for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:52:43 -0700 
(PDT)
Received: by 10.90.25.3 with SMTP id 3mr1587256agy;
        Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.90.66.17 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <acd782170610201852v29deeea2u39b429dbf4b7e0d1 AT mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:52:43 -0700
From: "K Randolph" <kwrandolph AT gmail.com>
To: "Seth Knorr" <ftbaccounts AT yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20061020211652.3467.qmail AT web50308.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <acd782170610201332n7c235780v68a221263cccfb37 AT mail.gmail.com>
        <20061020211652.3467.qmail AT web50308.mail.yahoo.com>
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] actual Hebrew question about Daniel 9:25
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8
Precedence: list
List-Id: Biblical Hebrew Forum <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
        <mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:52:43 -0000

Seth:

There is no text that insists that the six purposes be completed
within the seventy sevens, it is just the context that mentions it
within the seventy sevens. Since my mantra on this list has been
context, context, context, I would only be consistent to say that we
should look to the context that indicates, without insisting, that it
be within the seventh sevens.

Karl W. Randolph.

On 10/20/06, Seth Knorr <ftbaccounts AT yahoo.com> wrote:
> Karl,
>
>   I to believe that Christ fulfilled all six purposes on the cross. 
> However, there are many scholars that assert that these purpose do not need 
> to all be fulfilled inside the seventy weeks. I wanted to verify if there 
> was any validity at all to this view, in view of the context and text used 
> in the passage.
>
>   Regards,
>
>   Seth Knorr
>
>
> K Randolph <kwrandolph AT gmail.com> wrote:
>   Seth:
>
> It can be argued that Jesus fulfilled all these requirements. To
> reiterate, "to restrain (the same word as to put in prison) the rebel,
> to seal up (as a seal on a letter) errors, to cover (often used as a
> synonym for forgiveness) perversion, to cause to come the just one of
> eons, to seal up (again as on a letter, as if to say that it is
> finished) vision and prophecy, and to anoint the set apart (one) of
> the set aparts." Depending on your theology, you could say that Jesus
> fulfilled all of these with his death on the cross and resurrection.
>
> Yet the destruction of Jerusalem is mentioned at the end of the
> seventy sevens, implying that this is not the end of the world.
>
> Karl W. Randolph.
>
> On 10/20/06, Seth Knorr wrote:
> > Would it violate the text of Daniel 9:24 to state that all 6 purposes 
> > that where determined could be fulfilled outside the scope of the seventy 
> > sevens/weeks? ie. A purpose could be fulfilled after the seventy weeks, 
> > without violating the text and context.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Seth Knorr