Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Harold Holmyard <hholmyard AT ont.com>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel
  • Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:19:32 -0500

Dear Shoshanna,

"Even if an angel of G-d did give the vision to Daniel, it still came from G-d" Obviously everything comes from G-d. But if it came from an intermediary, it didn't come directly from G-d. And what do you mean, that "otherwise the vision would be from an angel of Satan"? There is only G-d, and Satan is only another angel, Satan doesn't have angels working under him. There are many many angels, an angel is a servant of G-d, and exists only to do a particular job, when its job is done, it ceases to exist - even Satan will no longer have a job to do one day.




HH: Have you ever read the Apocryphra? It reveals a Jewish concept of Satan that is like the Christian view of Satan, which of course was a Jewish view because the first Christians were all Jews. Here is something from the Jewish Encyclopedia on the view of Satan in the Apocrypha:
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=270&letter=S

The evolution of the theory of Satan keeps pace with the development of Jewish angelology and demonology. In Wisdom ii. 24 he is represented, with reference to Gen. iii., as the author of all evil, who brought death into the world; he is apparently mentioned also in Ecclus. (Sirach) xxi. 27, and the fact that his name does not occur in Daniel is doubtless due merely to chance. Satan was the seducer and the paramour of Eve, and was hurled from heaven together with other angels because of his iniquity (Slavonic Book of Enoch, xxix. 4 et seq.). Since that time he has been called "Satan," although previously he had been termed "Satanel" (ib. xxxi. 3 et seq.). The doctrine of the fall of Satan, as well as of the fall of the angels, is found also in Babylonia (Schrader, l.c. p. 464), and is mentioned several times in the New Testament. Satan rules over an entire host of angels (Martyrdom of Isaiah, ii. 2; Vita Adæ et Evæ, xvi.). Mastema, who induced God to test Abraham through the sacrifice of Isaac, is identical with Satan in both name and nature (Book of Jubilees, xvii. 18), and the Asmodeus of the Book of Tobit is likewise to be identified with him, especially in view of his licentiousness. As the lord of satans he not infrequently bears the special name Samael. It is difficult to identify Satan in any other passages of the Apocrypha, since the originals in which his name occurred have been lost, and the translations employ various equivalents. An "argumentum a silentio" can not, therefore, be adduced as proof that concepts of Satan were not wide-spread; but it must rather be assumed that reference to him and his realm is implied in the mention of evil spirits of every sort (comp. Demonology, and Kautzsch, "Apokryphen," Index).


Yours,
Harold Holmyard




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page