Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Peter Kirk <peter AT qaya.org>]

On 09/02/2006 20:48, Rochelle Altman wrote:
> ...
> Are you stating that your knowledge of the History of the English language 
> is culled from non dot edu websites? Condensation of material for a post to 
> a list is not an error.
>   

It seems clear that the matter is not as clear cut as you first 
presented it. It is also more complex than I realised. OK, you have a 
right to simplify arguments, but in that case you should admit that you 
have simplified them.

> I know what's in the APPOINTED Version published in 1611 and known as the 
> KJV. (The AUTHORIZED version is Coverdale's -- authorized by Henry VIII). ...

And who called it the Authorised Version? Not me.
...
> You seem to have a genius for missing the main points in posts:
>   

Perhaps I have a genius for noticing when people's main points are based 
on uncertain arguments. I know I don't always respond to the main point 
of a post. But I do think it is important to challenge poorly based 
arguments even when they are only supporting matters.
> ...
>
> When I do make a mistake, Peter, I admit it and correct it as soon as I 
> spot it.
>
>   
And so do I. If I have made any which I have not corrected, please let 
me know.

--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/