Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Ayin and Ghayin

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Read, James C" <K0434995 AT kingston.ac.uk>
  • To: "Peter Kirk" <peter AT qaya.org>
  • Cc: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Ayin and Ghayin
  • Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:18:24 +0100


I have a weak Lancashire accent. I've lost most of it through my various
travels.

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Kirk [mailto:peter AT qaya.org]
Sent: Sat 10/8/2005 8:40 PM
To: Read, James C
Cc: b-hebrew
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Ayin and Ghayin

On 07/10/2005 05:58, Read, James C wrote:

>...
>
>On the matter of sin/shin I think Karl has good reason to believe these
>represented
>one sound. Take for example the English 'u' (I know, I am now officially a
>hypocrite).Not so long ago Peter said that English 'u' is like a russion 'a'.
>Well, not for me it isn't! For me there is no difference between the
>'u' of run and the 'u' of bull. For Peter, they are two different phonemes
>and the 'u' of Peter's run is similar to my 'a' of ran. Estuary English goes
>the whole hog and I cannot distinguish the difference between my 'ran'
>and their 'run' and therefore have to rely on context to understand if they
>are referring to the past or the present. ...
>
>

Just to clarify, my example was based neither on the Estuary English of
my home town nor on a version like James' (is that Scottish, James?),
but on standard or Received Pronunciation British English. I was also
referring only to short unstressed vowels, in English and Russian.

--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.


This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.
>From peterkirk AT qaya.org Mon Oct 10 07:18:24 2005
Return-Path: <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from mail.link77.net (mail.kastanet.org [208.145.81.89])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632844C006
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 07:18:24 -0400
(EDT)
X-ExternalMail: External
X-Scanned-By: RAE MPP/Clamd http://raeinternet.com/mpp
Received: from [212.47.129.220] (account peter_kirk AT kastanet.org
[212.47.129.220] verified)
by mail.link77.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
with ESMTP-TLS id 88680196; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 07:18:23 -0400
Message-ID: <434A4DFC.10205 AT qaya.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:18:20 +0500
From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Read, James C" <K0434995 AT kingston.ac.uk>
References:
<6B84A53BD25BCA46B070A05DD8C8C9F874EED6 AT KUDBEX01.kuds.kingston.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To:
<6B84A53BD25BCA46B070A05DD8C8C9F874EED6 AT KUDBEX01.kuds.kingston.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Ayin and Ghayin
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:18:24 -0000

On 07/10/2005 05:58, Read, James C wrote:

>...
>
>On the matter of sin/shin I think Karl has good reason to believe these
>represented
>one sound. Take for example the English 'u' (I know, I am now officially a
>hypocrite).Not so long ago Peter said that English 'u' is like a russion 'a'.
>Well, not for me it isn't! For me there is no difference between the
>'u' of run and the 'u' of bull. For Peter, they are two different phonemes
>and the 'u' of Peter's run is similar to my 'a' of ran. Estuary English goes
>the whole hog and I cannot distinguish the difference between my 'ran'
>and their 'run' and therefore have to rely on context to understand if they
>are referring to the past or the present. ...
>
>

Just to clarify, my example was based neither on the Estuary English of
my home town nor on a version like James' (is that Scottish, James?),
but on standard or Received Pronunciation British English. I was also
referring only to short unstressed vowels, in English and Russian.

--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page