Biblical Hebrew Forum

["Karl Randolph" <kwrandolph AT email.com>]

Yitzhak:

I was not going to answer your response unless you 
added new data, and you did:


----- Original Message -----
From: "Yitzhak Sapir" <yitzhaksapir AT gmail.com>
> 
>   In fact, how do you know Onkelos wasn't given to Moses?
> Where does the Onkelos say that it wasn't?  So if you go by
> tradition for dating the Torah, you should go by tradition for the
> Zohar and Onkelos too, and date them accordingly, and then
> you have it -- complete and extensive religious texts from the time
> of Moses in Aramaic.
> 
> ...
> 
> I haven't.  I relate to the Hebrew data the same way as
> the statue -- the time it is dated.  The Massoretic data is
> dated according to the date of the manuscript whether it
> is the Leningrad Codex, or the Aleppo Codex.  The DSS
> the same.  The statue the same.  All data on the same
> grounds.  Like I said, by your method of dating,  you'd need
> to consider Onkelos and the Zohar as originating in the
> time of Moses.
> 
Do you know how ridiculous this sounds?
> 
> Yitzhak Sapir

This, and the rest of your message are not worth 
answering.

This message sent only as a matter of record.

Karl W. Randolph.

-- 
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm