b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Karl Randolph" <kwrandolph AT email.com>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Could This Be Nimrod
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 15:16:00 -0500
Don't take too much importance on the shape of Chinese
characters. The modern square characters resemble the
original forms about as much as the modern square Hebrew
letters resemble the forms found on the Gezar Calendar.
However, in both cases, we have intermediate forms that
show us how they changed.
Having said that, even in modern characters, the character
for "create" has a stroke meaning life or living, attached
to the form meaning dirt, over a mouth (shorthand for
person) enclosed in walking, translation: living dirt is
a walking (adult) person. The character for "ship" is an
eight person vessel (Noah's ark had eight persons). The
character for "devil" is a living thing in the cultivated
garden moving around secretly. In fact, much of the first
eleven chapters of Genesis can be found in the stories told
by how the characters are constructed. These characters all
predate Christian missionaries. If one looks at the earlier
character forms, more parallels to Genesis can be
recognized.
As for the Japanese, I have seen indications from other
sources saying that the Japanese connection to the Middle
East was from about the Roman period, not the "lost tribes".
Jews that got to Japan could have been from either of the
two major Jewish revolts, either as Roman slaves or
refugees. There are Chinese with family traditions claiming
Jewish ancestry from about the Roman period and later.
Karl W. Randolph.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Read, James C" <K0434995 AT kingston.ac.uk>
>
>
> The following link provides a history of the Chinese:
>
> http://www.threekingdoms.com/history.htm#2_3_1
>
> It states that:
>
> All accounts, however, agree that the basin of the Yellow River
> was the cradle of the Chinese culture, and that their ancestors
> were a nomadic people who, some five or six thousand years ago,
> migrated from the north-western part of Asia and finally settled in
> the northern-central part of what is now China.
>
> END QUOTE
>
> This could well have been a migrating family descendent of one of
> Noah's three children.
>
> It goes on to speak of a legend:
>
> 2. Mythological Era
> (BC 5000-2200)
>
> 2.1. Age of the Three Divine Rulers
>
> Given the first rank among the chieftains is Fuxi, or "Conqueror of
> Animals." He taught his subjects how to catch animals and fish with
> nets and to rear domestic animals for food. He is also the
> originator of the writing system which, with their improvements and
> modifications of ages, has been handed down to us in the form of
> the modern Chinese characters.
>
> END QUOTE
>
> Could this be Nimrod? Nimrod the great hunter in opposition to
> Yahoweh? The strokes of Chinese writings seem
> to have a lot in common with the strokes we see in cuneiform
> tablets and this could explain why so many Japanese words seem to
> come from semitic roots.
>
>
> Any thoughts?
--
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Could This Be Nimrod,
Patrick J. Emsweller, 08/02/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [b-hebrew] Could This Be Nimrod, Patrick J. Emsweller, 08/02/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Could This Be Nimrod, Read, James C, 08/02/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Could This Be Nimrod, Karl Randolph, 08/02/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Could This Be Nimrod, Read, James C, 08/02/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Could This Be Nimrod, Karl Randolph, 08/02/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.