Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Could This Be Nimrod

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Read, James C" <K0434995 AT kingston.ac.uk>
  • To: "Patrick J. Emsweller" <patrick AT clubgraves.com>
  • Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Could This Be Nimrod
  • Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 14:37:27 +0100


There is no theology of triads in tanakh. More likely a foreign philosophy
with strong pagan roots which made its way into Christian church in 4th
century via Constantine's amalgamation of Christianiy with Roman pagan
practices.

-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org on behalf of Patrick J. Emsweller
Sent: Tue 8/2/2005 2:21 PM
To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Could This Be Nimrod

Three Kingdoms, Three Rulers, Three letters in Yao - Triad

Thirty - Shun starts his public work at 30, so does Jesus, so does Zoroaster
etc.

60 or 600, the start or end of an event, i.e. 61st year it says the flood
started; in Noah's 601st year I believe the waters started to recede.



I'd have to look up specifically the 72; I just know that number is used
often as well.



-patrick



_____

From: Read, James C [mailto:K0434995 AT kingston.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 9:05 AM
To: Patrick J. Emsweller
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] Could This Be Nimrod





Sorry, could you expand on the number thing? I didn't really follow what
you are trying to say.

-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org on behalf of Patrick J. Emsweller
Sent: Tue 8/2/2005 1:13 PM
To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Could This Be Nimrod

Yes, other numbers that draw attention are 3, 30, 60 and 72 to identify a
few. In the text it is actually 61 for 60 and 73 for 72.



-patrick



_____

From: Read, James C [mailto:K0434995 AT kingston.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 7:16 AM
To: Patrick J. Emsweller
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: RE: [b-hebrew] Could This Be Nimrod





I have read that the chinese character for flood is composed of other
charcters which literally mean '8 people in a boat'.

-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org on behalf of Patrick J. Emsweller
Sent: Tue 8/2/2005 12:12 PM
To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Could This Be Nimrod


Besides "Yao" in my previous link, I think one can see a great many
commonalities with regards to the Chinese scriptures and other cultures
scriptures/histories. IMHO

-patrick

-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Read, James C
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 6:15 AM
To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [b-hebrew] Could This Be Nimrod


The following link provides a history of the Chinese:

http://www.threekingdoms.com/history.htm#2_3_1

It states that:

All accounts, however, agree that the basin of the Yellow River was the
cradle of the Chinese culture, and that their ancestors were a nomadic
people who, some five or six thousand years ago, migrated from the
north-western part of Asia and finally settled in the northern-central part
of what is now China.

END QUOTE

This could well have been a migrating family descendent of one of Noah's
three children.

It goes on to speak of a legend:

2. Mythological Era
(BC 5000-2200)

2.1. Age of the Three Divine Rulers

Given the first rank among the chieftains is Fuxi, or "Conqueror of
Animals." He taught his subjects how to catch animals and fish with nets and
to rear domestic animals for food. He is also the originator of the writing
system which, with their improvements and modifications of ages, has been
handed down to us in the form of the modern Chinese characters.

END QUOTE

Could this be Nimrod? Nimrod the great hunter in opposition to Yahoweh? The
strokes of Chinese writings seem
to have a lot in common with the strokes we see in cuneiform tablets and
this could explain why so many Japanese words seem to come from semitic
roots.


Any thoughts?

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.


This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.

_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.


This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.

_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.


This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.
>From peterkirk AT qaya.org Tue Aug 2 09:39:58 2005
Return-Path: <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from pan.hu-pan.com (unknown [67.15.6.3])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C224C008
for <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 09:39:58 -0400
(EDT)
Received: from 213-162-124-237.peterk253.adsl.metronet.co.uk
([213.162.124.237] helo=[10.0.0.1])
by pan.hu-pan.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.52)
id 1Dzwzo-0007Lt-5z; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:39:55 +0100
Message-ID: <42EF77B1.9070806 AT qaya.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:40:01 +0100
From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511
X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us, az, ru, tr, he, el, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vadim Cherny <VadimCherny AT mail.ru>
References: <20050801221232.9EBC14C006 AT lists.ibiblio.org>
<045d01c59766$3c7c88e0$0100a8c0@vadim>
In-Reply-To: <045d01c59766$3c7c88e0$0100a8c0@vadim>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - pan.hu-pan.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.ibiblio.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - qaya.org
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] YHWH pronunciation
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:39:58 -0000

On 02/08/2005 14:29, Vadim Cherny wrote:

>In the verb hypothesis, some transliteration of he would be expected, and
>the word could resemble Ieue, albeit remotely.
>In my hypothesis of 1-2-3ms suffixes, I could imagine Iaoe, but not Ieue,
>unless in rapid pronunciation.
>
>
>
I wonder if you would accept Iaoue as sufficiently close to your "Ieue".
After all, upsilon on its own is improbable as Greek routinely used the
omicron-upsilon diphthong for the sound "w". And don't forget that
Clement's form was (probably) Iaoue. Theodoret's Iabe is a variant of
Iaoue from a time or dialect when the "w" sound had changed to "v",
which by then was the pronunciation of Greek beta. So, Clement's and
Theodoret's evidence supports "the verb hypothesis".

--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page