Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: kgraham0938 AT comcast.net
  • To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?
  • Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:11:10 +0000

Looks like it is a dittography. The precedding word is LWM, it just gets
repeated before R:BB"H. If you have a BHS it is illustrated in the apparatus.

--
Kelton Graham
KGRAHAM0938 AT comcast.net

-------------- Original message --------------

> Hallo, Could someone perhaps offer some ideas as to why the 'mem' in the
> word for: 'increase' is written this way?
> Thankyou, Chris.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>From wattswestmaas AT eircom.net Thu Mar 17 15:26:41 2005
Return-Path: <wattswestmaas AT eircom.net>
X-Original-To: b-hebrew AT lists.Ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: b-hebrew AT lists.Ibiblio.org
Received: from mail11.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net
(mail11.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.27])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BD374C005
for <b-hebrew AT lists.Ibiblio.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:26:40 -0500
(EST)
Received: (qmail 43695 messnum 11083284 invoked from
network[159.134.216.204/159-134-216-204.as2.chf.cork.eircom.net]);
17 Mar 2005 20:26:38 -0000
Received: from 159-134-216-204.as2.chf.cork.eircom.net (HELO chrispc)
(159.134.216.204)
by mail11.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 43695) with SMTP;
17 Mar 2005 20:26:38 -0000
From: "wattswestmaas" <wattswestmaas AT eircom.net>
To: "B-Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.Ibiblio.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:26:19 -0000
Message-ID: <FAEIIKJEKGHNGLFNMDBCGEGECDAA.wattswestmaas AT eircom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Cc:
Subject: [b-hebrew] Samaritan script/proto-hebrew
X-BeenThere: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Hebrew Bible List <b-hebrew.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/b-hebrew>
List-Post: <mailto:b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew>,
<mailto:b-hebrew-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:26:41 -0000

Hallo Members,

I seem to be a little (or a lot) confused by the myriad of scripts that I
have managed to download from Near Eastern languages and the things that
people are saying.

To the point - My question: The samaritan script? It surely must have been
the assyrian script as well? Sice the people that were moved to Northern
Israel at the time of its emptying of hebrews were from Assyria and Chaldea
right? So they would have brought their writing with them? I have a
document before me that gives the impression that the samaritans adopted the
old aramaic/proto hebrew - which seems totally absurd!

Chris









Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page