b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
- To: Schmuel <schmuel AT escape.com>
- Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:55:24 +0000
On 18/03/2005 15:21, Schmuel wrote:
...Yes, because in Isaiah's time the script in use was the palaeo-Hebrew which has no distinct final forms. So this special case must have been introduced later.
Daniel's conclusion - the Holy Spirit inspired Isaiah to break the rules of Hebrew grammar and spelling :-)
Your mileage may vary.
But thanks for the interesting discussion.
--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.3 - Release Date: 15/03/2005
-
[b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
wattswestmaas, 03/17/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Yigal Levin, 03/17/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Schmuel, 03/18/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?, Peter Kirk, 03/18/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Schmuel, 03/18/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Dave Washburn, 03/18/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Tigran Aivazian, 03/18/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?, Kirk Lowery, 03/18/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?, Peter Kirk, 03/18/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Tigran Aivazian, 03/18/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?, kgraham0938, 03/17/2005
- RE: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?, Jerry Shepherd, 03/17/2005
-
[b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Daniel R. Pater, 03/24/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?, Yigal Levin, 03/24/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Yigal Levin, 03/17/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.