b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Kirk Lowery <klowery AT whi.wts.edu>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:21:38 -0500
Tigran Aivazian wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Dave Washburn wrote:
On Thursday 17 March 2005 12:54, wattswestmaas wrote:
Hallo, Could someone perhaps offer some ideas as to why the 'mem'
in the word for: 'increase' is written this way? Thankyou, Chris.
Based on the Qere correction by the Masoretes, it looks like a
simple scribal error.
Incidentally, if anybody uses the free Westminster Leningrad Codex
module, the Qere here has an error in it. Rather than showing the
final mem, it shows exactly the same form as the Qere, but with a
different accent. If somebody from that project is on this list,
that's an FYI. If you can tell me how to fix it in my copy (I'm
using GnomeSword with the Ezra SIL font) that would be a Very Good
Thing (TM).
I have checked the actual facsimile of L and also the reasonably
latest (4.3) Westminster Leningrad Codex source and confirm that,
indeed, WLC doesn't match B19A at Isa 9:6 wrt final mem.
The PDF version of WLC is still at v4.2 at the moment but I hope to
find some time to move it to 4.3 soon.
I can't remember if the Michigan encoding actually allows such things
like "m<EOW>" i.e. to force a final mem in the middle of the word.
If it doesn't, then I will manually fix this for Isa 9:6 when I
upload 4.3 version of WLC-B19A.pdf to www.bibles.org.uk.
Speaking as the maintainer of WLC, the Michigan encoding system does not distinguish between medial and final mem, kaf, etc. So there is no way to force a final mem anywhere. There is, however, a "bracket note", i.e., "]m" which flags the qere, signaling the problem in Isa 9:6.
As for fixing the problem in GnomeSword, I'm afraid you're going to have to either report the issue to the module maintainer, or else go into the module and edit it directly. The module is, if I recall correctly, in UTF-8 (Unicode), and so the maintainer used some sort of Michigan->UTF-8 conversion program.
Blessings,
Kirk
--
Kirk E. Lowery, PhD
Director, Westminster Hebrew Institute
Adjunct Professor of Old Testament
Westminster Theological Seminary, Philadelphia
--
"Good boy, Dex!"
-- Joseph "Sky Captain" Sullivan
-
[b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
wattswestmaas, 03/17/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Yigal Levin, 03/17/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Schmuel, 03/18/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?, Peter Kirk, 03/18/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Schmuel, 03/18/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Dave Washburn, 03/18/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Tigran Aivazian, 03/18/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?, Kirk Lowery, 03/18/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?, Peter Kirk, 03/18/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Tigran Aivazian, 03/18/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?, kgraham0938, 03/17/2005
- RE: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?, Jerry Shepherd, 03/17/2005
-
[b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Daniel R. Pater, 03/24/2005
- Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?, Yigal Levin, 03/24/2005
-
Re: [b-hebrew] Is 9:6 Mem clausum?,
Yigal Levin, 03/17/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.