Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - [b-hebrew] "their altars" or "his/its altars"?

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Deborah Millier <deborahmillier AT yahoo.com>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [b-hebrew] "their altars" or "his/its altars"?
  • Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 18:21:42 -0800 (PST)

Reinier de Blois wrote:

> You could argue that the singular
> possessive pronoun refers back to
> the singular YOWSHEB "inhabitant"
> in verse 12, which functions as a
> collective: a singular form with a
> plural meaning. Therefore neither
> the singular nor the plural possessives
> are incorrect.

Yeah . . . I’m not so much trying to establish what in
the text is “correct” (or not) as I am interested how
best to *understand* the text as is. When I read Exo
34:13 this last go around I simply *noticed* for the
first time the differences between the singular and
the plural possessives. (Tells you about my level of
Hebrew, huh?). Your comments provide me a possibility,
but then evoke the question: If the pronominal
suffixes all point to the same essential referent(s)
(i.e. the idolatrous inhabitants of the land), then
why would the writer have formally differentiated
):aS"RaYW from MiZB:XoTaM and MfC"BoTaM ?

It is possible, but unlikely to my mind that it was a
stylistic issue since the two preceding nouns were
feminine plural. So why ):aS"RaYW in the sentence
rather than a corresponding plural possessive
pronominal suffix? We’re only exploring viable
options. However, I’m not yet convinced that going up
to YoS”B (vs 12; or down to vs 15) satisfactorily
explains things as they stand. :-) Any more thoughts?

--Michael Millier
Manila, Philippines





__________________________________
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page