Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] Relevance Theory & Hebrew Semantics

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
  • To: "C. Stirling Bartholomew" <jacksonpollock AT earthlink.net>
  • Cc: hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Relevance Theory & Hebrew Semantics
  • Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:09:42 +0100

On 17/08/2004 19:19, C. Stirling Bartholomew wrote:

...

In the OT wisdom literature we run into similar problems. The book of
Ecclesiastes includes discourse units which seem to defy the notion of
semantic cohesion.
In evaluating the validity of any theoretical framework the first step is to
expose weaknesses in the presuppositions. The axiom of semantic cohesion
looks like a weakness in RT.


The axiom is basically that the text is intended to make sense, to communicate a message, at least to its target audience, in other words that it is not a random collection of words. If we abandon this axiom we may as well abandon any attempt to understand the text, because it is meaningless.

Of course we may not know who the target audience is, and for that and other reasons we may be unable to recover the message. But that is not a fault in the method, but a lack in our evidence in particular cases.

Some texts like Ecclesiastes, and parts of Proverbs, may be made up of a separate short discourses thrown together with no real cohesion. But at least we can assume that each such discourse is intended to make sense.

--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page