Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>]

On 18/03/2004 10:44, Dave Washburn wrote:

> If it's a fragment of Genesis then it should indeed have the second person 
> suffix.  That's why Peter (I think it was, but it may have been Stephen) 
> suggested that it's a paraphrase rather than a direct quote.  I'm inclined to 
> agree.
>
>  
My point was that even with the second person suffix it is not a direct 
quote, but a retelling (I won't call it a paraphrase because it is in 
the same language).


--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/