b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

[b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph

From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
To: Jonathan Walther <krooger AT debian.org>
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:28:43 -0800

On 21/02/2004 21:29, Jonathan Walther wrote:

... The
Qumran mss are reputed by some scholars to agree with LXX ten times more
often than with the Masoretic. Are those scholars wrong?

I think they have just been misreported. From my very uncertain memory the proportions would be the other way round. I am sure that others can clarify what has been written about this for example by Tov.

--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/

[b-hebrew] aph, Rudy Ruiz, 02/21/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] aph, Harold R. Holmyard III, 02/21/2004
  - Re: [b-hebrew] aph, Jonathan Walther, 02/21/2004
    - [b-hebrew] aph, Harold R. Holmyard III, 02/21/2004
    - Re: [b-hebrew] aph, Peter Kirk, 02/21/2004
      - Re: [b-hebrew] aph, Jonathan Walther, 02/22/2004
        
        [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph, Peter Kirk, 02/22/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] aph, Yigal Levin, 02/21/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [b-hebrew] aph, Ben and Jo Crick, 02/21/2004
  - Re: [b-hebrew] aph, Yigal Levin, 02/22/2004