Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] aph

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Yigal Levin" <leviny1 AT mail.biu.ac.il>
  • To: "b-hebrew" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] aph
  • Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 08:29:53 +0200

Actually, the various Medieval Jewish commentators also came up with the
same suggestions: "in anger", "double", "his own", "the best", etc. I think
that the idea of the double portion best fits both the wording and the
context.

Yigal

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben and Jo Crick" <ben.crick AT argonet.co.uk>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 2:32 AM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] aph


> On Sat 21 Feb 2004 (10:42:23), roodee AT thummy.com wrote:
> > In 1 Samuel 1:5 the word aph is giving me a bit of grief. The typical
> > meaning from NIDOTT is anger or nostrils. In Samuel it refers to some
> > some of portion Samuel gives to Hannah. Can anyone shed some light on
> > this word? Is it some idiomatic expression that I don't have the tools
> > to decipher? Any help would be appreciated.
>
>
> Dear Rudy,
>
> This has been a conundrum from antiquity. The Targum offers B:XiYR,
"choice",
> but this has no cognate relationship to 'aPPiYM. The KJV offers "a worthy
> portion".
>
> The LXX makes a tacit emendation, reading apparently 'ePeS KiY (PLHN
hOTI),
> with a Samech for a terminal Mem. Compare Numbers 13:28, 'ePeS KiY-`aZ
Ha`aM,
> a similar construction. This ignores the pause with athnach of course.
> "Nevertheless he loved Hannah; but YHWH had shut up her womb".
>
> Jerome in the Vulgate translates 'aPPiYM with /tristis/: /Annae autem
dedit
> partem unam tristis quia Annam diligebat. Dominus autem concluserat
vulvam
> eius./ Sad, because he loved her and the LORD had shut her womb? Angry
even?
> Compare Daniel 11:20 Lo' B:'aPPiYM not in anger. But Elqanah's anger was
> against the LORD in that case, not against his beloved Hannah.
>
> Gesenius offers "one portion of two people"; but while the synechdoche of
> a part for the whole can allow 'aP (nostril) to stand for PaNiYM (face),
> it is stretching it to make even two nostrils mean the owners of one
nostril
> each. Snorting down one's nostrils implies rage or anger; hence the
normal
> use of 'aP meaning anger. NIV and NRSV seems to follow this line; "a
double
> portion".
>
> So relax, Rudy: you are in good company!
>
> Shalom
> Ben
> --
> Revd Ben Crick BA CF, and Mrs Joanna (Goodwin) Crick ZFC Yb
> <ben.crick AT NOSPAM.argonet.co.uk>
> Acorn RPC700 RO4.03+Kinetic Card, 126MB, 4.3GB HD, CDROM
> 232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page