b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Re: [b-hebrew] aph

From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk AT qaya.org>
To: Jonathan Walther <krooger AT debian.org>
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] aph
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:03:03 -0800

On 21/02/2004 13:53, Jonathan Walther wrote:

Only one LXX, or the majority of extant LXX? Have any Hebrew
manuscripts of the scriptures (besides the Qumran) been found yet that
predate the earliest copies of LXX?

There are no older MSS (besides the ones which are older). So don't try to use this as an argument for the priority of the LXX.

--
Peter Kirk
peter AT qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk AT qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/

[b-hebrew] aph, Rudy Ruiz, 02/21/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] aph, Harold R. Holmyard III, 02/21/2004
  - Re: [b-hebrew] aph, Jonathan Walther, 02/21/2004
    - [b-hebrew] aph, Harold R. Holmyard III, 02/21/2004
    - Re: [b-hebrew] aph, Peter Kirk, 02/21/2004
      - Re: [b-hebrew] aph, Jonathan Walther, 02/22/2004
        
        [b-hebrew] Qumran agreement with LXX and MT, was: aph, Peter Kirk, 02/22/2004
- Re: [b-hebrew] aph, Yigal Levin, 02/21/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [b-hebrew] aph, Ben and Jo Crick, 02/21/2004
  - Re: [b-hebrew] aph, Yigal Levin, 02/22/2004