b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Andy Warren" <andy_warren AT sil.org>
- To: <b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: "Non-Academic" Original Languages?
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:27:41 +0100
Trevor,
> as a collection of
> literary dialects, it would probably be appropriate to say that [BH] was
never
> a spoken language as such.
Do you really believe this as strongly as this comment suggests?
Do you see a bigger distinction between literary and spoken Classical Hebrew
than you would think existed between literary and spoken French (a language
which, like Classical Hebrew, has an aorist which is largely restricted to
written language)?
What evidence do you find in the available spoken Classical Hebrew material
;-) which contrasts with the literary material?
Andy Warren
----
-
RE: "Non-Academic" Original Languages?
, (continued)
- RE: "Non-Academic" Original Languages?, Peter Kirk, 12/18/2002
- RE: "Non-Academic" Original Languages?, Peter Kirk, 12/18/2002
- RE: "Non-Academic" Original Languages?, Peter Kirk, 12/18/2002
- RE: "Non-Academic" Original Languages?, Trevor & Julie Peterson, 12/18/2002
- RE: "Non-Academic" Original Languages?, Trevor & Julie Peterson, 12/18/2002
- RE: "Non-Academic" Original Languages?, Trevor & Julie Peterson, 12/18/2002
- RE: "Non-Academic" Original Languages?, S. L., 12/19/2002
- Fw: RE: "Non-Academic" Original Languages?, S. L., 12/19/2002
- RE: "Non-Academic" Original Languages?, Vincent Medina, 12/19/2002
- RE: "Non-Academic" Original Languages?, Andy Warren, 12/19/2002
- RE: "Non-Academic" Original Languages?, Andy Warren, 12/19/2002
- RE: "Non-Academic" Original Languages?, Peter Kirk, 12/20/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.