b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: "Ian Hutchesson" <mc2499 AT mclink.it>
- To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: raqia encore
- Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 19:05:47 +0200
>It was just a few
>months ago that we went around and around over the purported
>tehom/tiamat cognate, the place of Enuma Elish in the grand
>scheme of things, and all the rest.
"purported tehom/tiamat cognate"
I gather, Dave, that you are disputing that these are
cognates (despite the fact that most have recognized
the situation for over a century).
Why? Is there something in the comparative linguistics
which is not clear on the matter? Could you be precise
on your dispute?
Ian
-
RE: raqia encore
, (continued)
- RE: raqia encore, Bill Ross, 07/23/2002
- Re: raqia encore, Ian Hutchesson, 07/24/2002
- RE: raqia encore, Peter Kirk, 07/24/2002
- RE: raqia encore, Dave Washburn, 07/24/2002
- RE: raqia encore, Peter Kirk, 07/24/2002
- RE: raqia encore, Dave Washburn, 07/24/2002
- Re: raqia encore, Ian Hutchesson, 07/24/2002
- Re: raqia encore, Dave Washburn, 07/24/2002
- Re: raqia encore, Ian Hutchesson, 07/27/2002
- Re: raqia encore, Dave Washburn, 07/27/2002
- Re: raqia encore, Ian Hutchesson, 07/27/2002
- RE: raqia encore, Peter Kirk, 07/27/2002
- Re: raqia encore, Ian Hutchesson, 07/27/2002
- Re: raqia encore, Rolf Furuli, 07/28/2002
- RE: raqia encore, Peter Kirk, 07/28/2002
- RE: raqia encore, Peter Kirk, 07/28/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.