b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Rolf Furuli <furuli AT online.no>
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu
- Subject: RE: Hebrew Syntax.
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:46:36 +0200
Title: RE: Hebrew Syntax.
Dear Peter,
I have not tried to discredit any hypothesis. It was Moon who
draw the conclusion that my example was a couter-example of Galia's
conclusion regarding modality.
I just asked you to analyse one passage by the help of discourse
analysis, implying that you either argued in favor of the YIQTOL
representing foreground or background information. I reproduce my
question below:
Dear discourse analysts,
Today I have been working with all the examples of BW) ("to
come in") realized as YIQTOLs with past reference. To illustrate
the influence of discourse analysis on Bible translation, I invite
you to analyse 2 Samuel 15:37 by help of this method and any other
method you deem fit.
Question: Do you prefer the first group of renderings, and in
that case, why? Or do you prefer the second group of renderings, and
in that case, why?
NIV So David's
friend Hushai arrived at Jerusalem as Absalom was entering the
city.
NLT So David's
friend Hushai returned to Jerusalem, getting there just as Absalom
arrived.
NRSV So Hushai,
David's friend, came into the city, just as Absalom was entering
Jerusalem.
RSV So Hushai,
David's friend, came into the city, just as Absalom was entering
Jerusalem.
KJV So Hushai
David's friend came into the city, and Absalom came into
Jerusalem.
ASV
So Hushai, David's friend, came into the city; and Absalom came into
Jerusalem.
LUTHER So
kam Huschai, der Freund Davids, in die Stadt. Und Absalom zog in
Jerusalem ein.
Rolf, my whole point is that one (alleged) counter-example is not enough
to discredit a hypothesis. Even 3-4% are not. So I won't waste my time
on individual counter-examples. Anyway, I am discussing methodology not
specific hypotheses. And I've forgotten which example we are talking
about here.
Peter Kirk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rolf Furuli [mailto:furuli AT online.no]
> Sent: 15 April 2002 08:11
> To: Biblical Hebrew
> Subject: RE: Hebrew Syntax.
>
> Dear Peter,
>
>
> Nobody has so far analysed my example. could you please do that.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Rolf
>
>
> Rolf Furuli
>
> University of Oslo
Regards Rolf
Rolf Furuli
University of Oslo
-
RE: Hebrew Syntax.
, (continued)
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Rolf Furuli, 04/12/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Rolf Furuli, 04/14/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Rolf Furuli, 04/14/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Moon-Ryul Jung, 04/14/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Peter Kirk, 04/14/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Peter Kirk, 04/14/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Dave Washburn, 04/14/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Rolf Furuli, 04/15/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Rolf Furuli, 04/15/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Peter Kirk, 04/15/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Rolf Furuli, 04/15/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Peter Kirk, 04/15/2002
- Re: Hebrew Syntax., Bryan Rocine, 04/15/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.