b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Rolf Furuli <furuli AT online.no>
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.metalab.unc.edu
- Subject: RE: Hebrew Syntax.
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 09:14:04 +0200
Title: RE: Hebrew Syntax.
Dear Moon, Peter, and Dave,
In my view, Galia has produced a very fine scientific work.
However, it just covers a part of the Hebrew Bible and her
interpretations of some of her examples may be open to discussion.
The example I used is not an exception.
In my analysis of all the YIQTOLS of the MT (13.625, I may
have missed a few, and a few were textually spurious) I got the
following results:
Past 1.022
Pre-past 5
Perfect 173
Present:1.804
gnomic 657
Future 4.841
Modal 5.117
I ascribe modality to "only" 37,6 % of them. Even some
YIQTOLs which are sentence initial evidently are indicative. In his
article "The Distribution of Short and Long Imperfect Forms in
Biblical Hebrew", Le$onenu 1,2, 5760-5761, 2000-2001, Moshe
Florentin refers to "150 indicative forms (not cohortative) in a
head position /sentence initial/"
The reproduction below of one of the tables of my thesis
regarding BW) with past meaning shows that YIQTOL is frequently used
in the indicative. There are many more examples of BW) than
those that occur in the table and hundreds of examples of other
YIQTOLs with past meaning in the indicative.
a
Genesis 6:4 The
Nephilim were (wyDh) in the earth in that days, and also after that,
when the sons of God were going (waøbÎy rRvSa) to the daughters of men and they bore
(wdVlÎy×w) sons to them
b Genesis
27:33 and I ate (lAkOaÎw) of everything before you
came in (awøbD;t M®rRfV;b) and I blessed him (whEkßrDbSaÎw)
c Genesis
30.38 And the staffs that he had peeled
(lExIÚp), he placed (gExÅ¥yÅw) in front of the flock, in the gutters, in the
watering troughs, where the flocks came (Î NaøbD;t rRvSa) to drink
d Genesis 41.50
Before the year of famine came (awøbD;t M®rRfV;b), two sons were born
(dA;l¨y) to Joseph
e Judges
14:18 Before the sun went down
(aøbÎy
M®rRfV;b) on
the seventh day the men of the town said (wrVmaø¥yÅw) to him
f 2 Samuel 15.37
And David's friend Husai came (aøbÎ¥yÅw) into the city; also Absalom came
(aøbÎy
MølDvVbAa×w)
into Jerusalem.
b
c
d
e
f
g
1 Kings 3.16 Then two women,
prostitutes, came in (hÎnaøbD;t zDa) to the king, and they stood (hÎndOmSoA;tÅw) before him
h
1 Kings 4:28 And the barley
and the straw for the horses and for the teams of horses they kept
bringing
(waIbÎy
vRkrDl×w MyIsw;sAl NRbR;tAh×w
MyîrOoVÚcAh×w) to the proper place
i
2 Kings 6:32 And Elisha was
sitting (bEvOy) in his own house, and the older men were sitting
(MyIbVvOy) with him; and he sent (jAlVv¥yÅw) a man before him. Before the messenger
had come in (aøbÎy M®rRfV;b), he himself said (rAmDa) to the older men
j
2 Kings 19.33 By the way that he
came (aøbÎy_rRvSa) he will return (bwvÎy) (yiqt past and fut)
k
2Kings 20:14 And Isaiah the
prophet came in (aøbÎ¥yÅw) to king Hezekiah and said (rRmaø¥yÅw) to him: "What did these
men say
(wrVmDa) and from where did they come (waøbÎy
NyAaEmw)
l
1 Chronicles 9:28
For it was by number that they were brought in (MwayIb×y
rDÚpVsImVbw)
and it was by number tht they were brought out (MwayIxwøy)
m
Ezra 10:8
And anyone that did not come (awøbÎy_aøl) in three days all his goods was put
under ban (MårFjÎy)
n
Nehemiah 13:19 And some of my own
attendants I stationed (yI;tdAmToRh) at the gates; no one came in (awøbÎy_aøl) on the Sabbath day
o Esther 2:14
She did not go in (awøbDt_aøl) again to the king unless the king had taken delight
(XEpDj_MIa) and she was called (hDarVqn×w) by name
p Ezekiel
19:9 And they put (wh¨nV;t¥yÅw) him in a cage by means of hooks, and they
brought (whUaIb×yÅw) him to the king of Babylon. They brought
(whUaIb×y) him into prison, so his voice was no longer heard
on the mountains of Israel.
q Habakkuk
3:16 I heard (yI;tVoAmDv), and my belly trembled (zÅgrI;tÅw), my lips quivered
(wlSlDx) at the sound, rottenness entered (awøbÎy) into my bones, and I
trembled (zÎgrRa) within myself.
o
p
q
Regards
Rolf
Rolf
Furuli
University of
Oslo
Moon, may I answer you here as one also trained originally in science
and who then worked as an engineer. In most branches of science, if a
hypothesis has a 96% or 97% fit with the observed facts (as here), the
general truth of that hypothesis is considered rather strongly
indicated. Of course one then needs to look at the remaining results.
They may be spurious or corrupted (cf. here the text may be corrupt);
but one would need to look into whether that is reasonable. Or one might
find that this small residue of results can be accounted for by making
adjustments to the hypothesis. Sometimes it might be necessary to leave
the hypothesis as incomplete and uncertain because a residue of results
has not been accounted for. But I am sure no scientist would reject a
hypothesis completely because of a 3-4% discrepancy.
Peter Kirk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Moon-Ryul Jung [mailto:moon AT sogang.ac.kr]
> Sent: 14 April 2002 16:24
> To: Biblical Hebrew
> Subject: RE: Hebrew Syntax.
>
> Rolf,
> As a topic related to this exercise, G. Hatav believes that
> yiqtol and weqatal are "modals". Your example is a counterexample
> to her thesis. In her book, she also noted some non-modal uses of
> yiqtol and said it is difficult to explain them (She thinks some are
> corrupted because some other versions do not use yiqtol in those
> examples.) The non-modal use of yiqtol is 3% [more than 30] of the
1121
> yiqtol's in her corpus, which is Genesis through Kings. The non-modal
use
> of weqatal is 4% of the 573 weqatal's.
>
> I have no idea how to deal with this kind or this amount of
> counterexample. Hatav seems to think it does not invalidate her
> thesis. As a scientist/engineer in training, I wonder how such
> counterexamples do not invalidate her thesis. If there is no way
> to explain away these counterexamples, how is it that they do not
> invalidate the thesis? Is there some agreement going on here among
> the players in the field?
>
> Moon
> Moon R. Jung
> Sogang Univ, Seoul, Korea
>
>
>
>
>
> Moon
> Moon R. Jung
> Sogang Univ, Seoul, Korea
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: [Peter_Kirk AT sil.org]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to leave-b-hebrew-
> 14207U AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
> To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
-
RE: Hebrew Syntax.
, (continued)
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Peter Kirk, 04/12/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Lee R. Martin, 04/12/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Rolf Furuli, 04/12/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Rolf Furuli, 04/14/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Rolf Furuli, 04/14/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Moon-Ryul Jung, 04/14/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Peter Kirk, 04/14/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Peter Kirk, 04/14/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Dave Washburn, 04/14/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Rolf Furuli, 04/15/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Rolf Furuli, 04/15/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Peter Kirk, 04/15/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Rolf Furuli, 04/15/2002
- RE: Hebrew Syntax., Peter Kirk, 04/15/2002
- Re: Hebrew Syntax., Bryan Rocine, 04/15/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.