Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: Written by Women.???

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Dave Washburn" <dwashbur AT nyx.net>
  • To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: Written by Women.???
  • Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 06:35:04 -0700


> Dave,
>
> to be exactly, I did not say they could not. I said that the data at hand
> SUGGEST they DID not. The data I refer to, is the fact that especially the
> writing of cuneiform demanded a very intensive education to become a writer
> which was a kind of office in that time. Women were not educated for that
> profession because women did not hold public offices. Moreover, what we know
> about writing and writers (Mesopotamia, but also Egypt) is that they were
> men; cf. for example the pictures of scribes in ANEP, 71ff; ABD, vol. 5,
> 1012ff).

Aside from the pictures, though, I'm still wondering what the
evidence for all this is. We have pictures of male scribes, yes, but
we have female members of royal families, queens in Egypt and
such, so I'm not sure a handful of pictures preserved by the whims
of chance really tell us anything as definitive as you suggest. You
still talk about "data" but I'm still waiting to hear what this "data" is.

> The difference between the cuneiform and alphabetic script is that the
> learning of the writing was less difficult. This made it possible that
> knowledge of writing was not restricted to the scribes alone.

Once again, it's easy to say this sort of thing, but I'm still
wondering about the "data" you mentioned.

Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
"No study of probabilities inside a given frame can ever
tell us how probable it is that the frame itself can be
violated." C. S. Lewis




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page