b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Ausra Pazera <apazera AT yahoo.co.uk>
- To: Charles David Isbell <cisbell AT home.com>, Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 05:53:09 +0000 (GMT)
Yes, it's may be very insulting for non-Christians,
but even for Christians... I wonder how long Christian
biblists will imagine that they have some monopol for
understanding the HEBREW BIBLE? I suppose that we
don't make here theological researches, and it's
inconsistent to make such a kind of theological
declarations as "foreshadowing" etc... That's even
inconsistent for understanding the text's written much
earler texts of Paul and other writers of NT. I
completely agree with Charles David Isabel...
Ausra
--- Charles David Isbell <cisbell AT home.com> wrote: >
Glen wrote: "Paul mentions numerous times that
> events of the Old Testament
> were but a "foreshadowing"."
>
> Do you not realize how insulting this is to people
> who are not Christian?
> Or do you not care?
>
> Glen again: "Peter Kirk's "physical vs. spiritual
> sustenance" theory is
> theologically proven out (again) in John 7 where
> Jesus speaks toward the
> physical manna consumed in the wilderness by those
> who "died"; this Jesus
> does, in comparison to the spiritual manna which
> Christ offered to those
> "who should not perish".
>
> How can the NT "prove" anything about the meaning of
> the Hebrew Bible [I
> note that you persist in calling it the OLD
> Testament]? It can show only
> how the early Church chose to reconstruct parts of
> the Bible for its own
> use. But that does not ipso facto constitute THE
> meaning of the Hebrew
> Bible. It is only one Christian/NT way of declaring
> meaning. When you use
> Christian/NT lens of faith as a "pony" to understand
> and then shovel
> Christian meaning backwards onto prior literature,
> you are not interpreting
> the Hebrew Scriptures, but preaching about your own
> prior commitment to a
> system of theology. Come on. This list is about
> B-Hebrew, not
> fundamentalist ideas about inerrancy or Christian
> supersessionism.
>
> Shalom,
> Charles David Isbell
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as:
> [apazera AT yahoo.co.uk]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to
> $subst('Email.Unsub')
> To subscribe, send an email to
> join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.
>
=====
Ausra Pazera
Vilnius University
Religious Studies Centre
Universiteto 3
2061 Vilnius
Lithuania
____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
-
Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know,
Karl Ivan Baca, 02/12/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know, Peter Kirk, 02/13/2001
- Re: Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know, Tsadowq, 02/14/2001
- Re: Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know, Charles David Isbell, 02/14/2001
- Re: Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know, Ausra Pazera, 02/15/2001
- Re: Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know, Dave Washburn, 02/15/2001
- Re: Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know, Dave Washburn, 02/15/2001
-
Re: Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know,
Charles David Isbell, 02/15/2001
- Re: Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know, Dave Washburn, 02/15/2001
- RE: Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know, Liz Fried, 02/15/2001
-
Re: Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know,
Cindy Smith, 02/15/2001
- Re: Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know, Charles David Isbell, 02/15/2001
-
Message not available
- Re: Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know, Christine Bass, 02/15/2001
- RE: Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know, Dave Washburn, 02/15/2001
- RE: Is this a rock or not? I Would like to know, Jay Childs, 02/15/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.