b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Dan Wagner <Dan.Wagner AT datastream.net>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: Arabic Bible
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 10:50:38 -0500
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Kirk [mailto:Peter_Kirk AT sil.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 08:28
> To: Dan Wagner; Biblical Hebrew
> Subject: RE: Arabic Bible
>
>
> That may be the more recent Muslim apologetic. But in the
> original Muslim
> tradition, the Qur'an, there is an explicit injunction to
> read the Tovrat =
> Hebrew Bible and the Injil = New Testament. So in answer to
> these Muslim
> claims that the text is corrupted, one can ask when the text was first
> corrupted, before or after the time of Muhammad. If they say
> "before", then
> ask why Muhammad was instructed to read these corrupted
> texts. If they say
> "after", then they will have to agree that MSS from before
> Muhammad's time
> are not corrupt, and you can show them DSS and the 4th-5th
> century CE folios
> of LXX and NT.
>
> Peter Kirk
Agreed! (Although i have not found your logic to be effective in the
contacts i've had so far.)
Dan Wagner
-
Arabic Bible,
Ray Clendenen, 01/01/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Arabic Bible, Shoshanna Walker, 01/01/2001
- Re: Arabic Bible, Jonathan Bailey, 01/02/2001
- RE: Arabic Bible, Peter Kirk, 01/02/2001
- Re: Arabic Bible, Jonathan D. safren, 01/03/2001
- RE: Arabic Bible, Dan Wagner, 01/03/2001
- RE: Arabic Bible, Peter Kirk, 01/04/2001
- RE: Arabic Bible, Dan Wagner, 01/05/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.