Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re[3]: MELEK HA(WOLAM

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Peter Kirk"<peter_kirk AT sil.org>
  • To: <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>, <Richard.Petersen AT noaa.gov>
  • Subject: Re[3]: MELEK HA(WOLAM
  • Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:03:43 -0400


I think the problem here is that the English words "eternal" and
"eternity" have become debased and are popularly understood to refer
to infinite future time. But originally they meant much more like the
Hebrew, referring to the timelessness of God as distinct from the
time-boundedness of the created order. In that sense "eternal King" or
"King of eternity" is a good rendering.

Whereas the exact phrase in the subject line is post-biblical, Psalm
10:16 reads YHWH MELEK (OWLFM WF(ED, which differs only in lacking the
definite article, and in linking (OWLFM with (ED. Does this link
stress the temporal character here, or perhaps rather stress the
other-worldly character? In other cases e.g. Psalm 29:10 we have
phrases like MELEK L:(OWLFM. But this stresses the futurity, as
distinct from the past eternity in focus in Psalm 93:2 M"(OWLFM )FT.FH
. See also Psalm 145:13.

Peter Kirk


______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re[2]: MELEK HA(WOLAM
Author: <Richard.Petersen AT noaa.gov> at Internet
Date: 10/04/2000 17:38


Since, according to the HB, God created all things; all matter, and
therefor space and time: God transcends time. This being the case, it
seems both 'king of eternity' and 'eternal king' would both fall far
short of describing God's relationship with time. Is this why there
is no English equivalent to the Hebrew phrase in question?


______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: MELEK HA(WOLAM
Author: hholmyard AT ont.com at EXTERNAL
Date: 4/10/2000 2:58 PM


The choice between the eternal king or the king of eternity seems to be one
of English usage, where the two can be equivalent. The king of eternity
corresponds to the Hebrew, but it is not especially meaningful in English
today; so I would favor "the eternal king." The issue is also a matter of
what the phrase meant to the Jews who used it.



---
You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: Richard.Petersen AT noaa.gov
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
$subst('Email.Unsub')
To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.

---
You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: Peter_Kirk AT sil.org
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
leave-b-hebrew-14207U AT franklin.oit.unc.e
du
To subscribe, send an email to join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page