Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - FW: Re[8]: Methods in biblical scholarship

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Niels Peter Lemche <npl AT teol.ku.dk>
  • To: "'b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu'" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: FW: Re[8]: Methods in biblical scholarship
  • Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 22:06:41 +0100




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Niels Peter Lemche
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 December, 1999 22:06
> To: 'peter_kirk AT sil.org'
> Subject: RE: Re[8]: Methods in biblical scholarship
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: peter_kirk AT sil.org [SMTP:peter_kirk AT sil.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 December, 1999 23:42
> To: Biblical Hebrew
> Cc: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
> Subject: Re[8]: Methods in biblical scholarship
>
> I don't think I ever claimed a uniform process of canonisation. I was
> looking for evidence that ANY of the many Jewish groups, at ANY time,
> considered Enoch as Holy Scripture, on the level of the Torah or the
> prophets. I have seen no such evidence. There have been some
> suggestions, which I cannot refute, that some fringe Jewish groups may
> have considered Enoch as such. But this was clearly not the main
> stream.
>
> Peter Kirk
>
> [Niels Peter Lemche] How do you know that they were fringe Jews, except
> from the standpoint of later rabbinic Judaism?
>
> NPL
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page