b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Joseph Crea <Joseph.Crea AT worldnet.att.net>
- To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Textual Criticism
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 19:45:19 -0500
Hello Jim!
At 08:31 PM 10/20/99 -0400, you wrote:
>At 08:14 PM 10/20/99 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>
>>Are there any experts on the list who can comment on the existence and
>>state of any such Old Latin text of the Hebrew scriptures?
>
>Yes, its called the old Latin (Vetus Latina) and was used by Jerome before
>he did his own rendering.
>
>> Or on what
>>doubt is cast on the MT by Jewish commentators?
>
>None. To say that the "jewish commentators" cast doubt on the MT is to say
>the "KJV only" people cast doubt on it.
CREA
Make that SOME of the "KJV-ONLY" folks. I know that both the people at
the Trinitarian Bible Society (UK) and Dr. D.A. Waite, absolutely dote over
ben Chayyim's 2nd Rabbinic Bible as opposed to the perfidious and heretical
"ben Asher" text used in BHK^3 and BHS. I think I remember readin
something in one's of Ruckman's outpourings of effluvium that the Old Latin
preserved a superior text to the "so-called" Septuagint, but like the rest
of his "literary" output it turned out to be just more of his trademark
ranting and raving.
With Mettaa,
Joseph Crea
<Joseph.Crea AT worldnet.att.net>
-
Textual Criticism,
Don Elbourne, 10/19/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Textual Criticism, Dave Washburn, 10/19/1999
- Re: Textual Criticism, Jim West, 10/19/1999
- RE: Textual Criticism, Don Elbourne, 10/19/1999
- RE: Textual Criticism, Joseph Crea, 10/20/1999
- RE: Textual Criticism, Kevin W. Woodruff, 10/20/1999
- Re: Textual Criticism, Ruthy & Baruch, 10/20/1999
- Re: Textual Criticism, peter_kirk, 10/20/1999
- Re: Textual Criticism, Jim West, 10/20/1999
- Re: Textual Criticism, Joseph Crea, 10/20/1999
- RE: Textual Criticism, Don Elbourne, 10/20/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.