xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
- From: csad7 AT t-online.de
- To: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [XOM-interest] XOM performance compared
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:04:07 +0200
hello,
are there any performance comparisons between lets say XOM and dom4j/JDOM etc?
I try to persuade some colleges at work to use XOM instead of dom4j (which has bitten some projects with some nasty details mostly issues about whitespace handling) but they question the performance of XOM.
Googling did not bring any real help, so I'd think I'll ask here...
thanks a lot
christof
-
[XOM-interest] XOM performance compared,
csad7, 07/22/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM performance compared, Elliotte Harold, 07/22/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM performance compared,
Wolfgang Hoschek, 07/22/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM performance compared,
jason mazzotta, 07/22/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM performance compared, jason mazzotta, 07/22/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM performance compared, Elliotte Harold, 07/22/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM performance compared,
Christof, 07/23/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM performance compared, Elliotte Harold, 07/23/2005
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM performance compared, Wolfgang Hoschek, 07/25/2005
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM performance compared,
jason mazzotta, 07/22/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.