XOM API for Processing XML with Java

[Wolfgang Hoschek <whoschek AT lbl.gov>]

Would be interesting. I'm not aware of such a thorough study. Having  
said that, I'd be somewhat surprised if they were more efficient. It  
probably also depends on the main usage pattern.

Wolfgang.

On Jul 22, 2005, at 2:04 AM, csad7 AT t-online.de wrote:

> hello,
> are there any performance comparisons between lets say XOM and
> dom4j/JDOM etc?
>
> I try to persuade some colleges at work to use XOM instead of dom4j
> (which has bitten some projects with some nasty details mostly issues
> about whitespace handling) but they question the performance of XOM.
>
> Googling did not bring any real help, so I'd think I'll ask here...
>
> thanks a lot
> christof
> _______________________________________________
> XOM-interest mailing list
> XOM-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/xom-interest