XOM API for Processing XML with Java

[jason mazzotta <jazzdman AT comcast.net>]

I did a simple benchmark test to compare XOM and JDOM performance.  I 
don't know if this makes sense, but, the test compared the contents of 
the new Node to all the other Nodes in the Document.  The Node was then 
added to the Document in an order based on the contents of the Node.  
XOM and JDOM performed very similarly.

Jason Mazzotta

On Jul 22, 2005, at 6:51 PM, Wolfgang Hoschek wrote:

> Would be interesting. I'm not aware of such a thorough study. Having
> said that, I'd be somewhat surprised if they were more efficient. It
> probably also depends on the main usage pattern.
>
> Wolfgang.
>
> On Jul 22, 2005, at 2:04 AM, csad7 AT t-online.de wrote:
>
> > hello,
> > are there any performance comparisons between lets say XOM and
> > dom4j/JDOM etc?
> >
> > I try to persuade some colleges at work to use XOM instead of dom4j
> > (which has bitten some projects with some nasty details mostly issues
> > about whitespace handling) but they question the performance of XOM.
> >
> > Googling did not bring any real help, so I'd think I'll ask here...
> >
> > thanks a lot
> > christof
> > _______________________________________________
> > XOM-interest mailing list
> > XOM-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/xom-interest
>
> _______________________________________________
> XOM-interest mailing list
> XOM-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/xom-interest