xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
- From: jcowan AT reutershealth.com
- To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Put methods
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:19:06 -0500
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:
> I don't see an obvious use case for this right now.Since adding it in
> the future would not be backwards incompatible with existing code,
> I'm going to hold off on this until it becomes obvious that it's
> necessary.
I accept this. The use case is similar to that of DocFragment in DOM;
it allows you to keep a sequence of Nodes without the implementation
or conceptual baggage of either Document or Element. Currently, Nodes
shows its read-only ancestry, but exposes mutator methods insert, append,
and remove without the most basic mutator. I proposed put for symmetry
with get, but I agree that replace is less confusing.
--
One Word to write them all, John Cowan <jcowan AT reutershealth.com>
One Access to find them, http://www.reutershealth.com
One Excel to count them all, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
And thus to Windows bind them. --Mike Champion
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call
, (continued)
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call, dirk bergstrom, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
jcowan, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call, John Cowan, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
Bradley S. Huffman, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
John Cowan, 02/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call, Bradley S. Huffman, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
John Cowan, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
jcowan, 02/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call, Bill de hÓra, 02/02/2004
-
[XOM-interest] Put methods,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/05/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Put methods, jcowan, 02/05/2004
-
[XOM-interest] hasChildren vs. getChildCount == 0,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] hasChildren vs. getChildCount == 0,
Dirk Bergstrom, 02/05/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] hasChildren vs. getChildCount == 0, Bill de hÓra, 02/05/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] hasChildren vs. getChildCount == 0, Janek Bogucki, 02/09/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] hasChildren vs. getChildCount == 0,
Dirk Bergstrom, 02/05/2004
- [XOM-interest] UNDECLARED vs. CDATA, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/05/2004
- [XOM-interest] Namespace methods, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/05/2004
- [XOM-interest] Builder issues, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/05/2004
- [XOM-interest] ID or identifier, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/05/2004
- [XOM-interest] NodeFactory issues, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/06/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.