xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java
List archive
- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
- To: jcowan AT reutershealth.com
- Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:48:02 -0500
At 2:14 PM -0500 2/2/04, jcowan AT reutershealth.com wrote:
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:
This is the *LAST CALL* development release of XOM 1.0.
When you announce a last call, you usually should mention the deadline
for reviews, so people know how long they have.
I really don't know. But I figure there's at least a few weeks before I'll be able to get back to this in a serious way.
Node:
1) I'm now going to argue that hasChildren should be removed in favor of
using getChildCount() == 0. In a proper JIT they should be exactly
the same at run time, and it's really trivial to write one's own
method hasChildren(Node n) if you must have it.
I sort of like hasChildren(), but I'll check and see how much I'm actually using it. What does everyone else think?
Nodes:
1) I think it's worth having a put method to complement get. The only
way to replace a single Node in the list currently is either to copy
it, which does not preserve object identity, or else to remove and
then insert/append, which involves copying the list anywhere up to
twice internally (if you want to replace the zeroth node), and requires
getting the insert vs. append choice correct.
I'm sorry. I don't think I understand your proposal here. What would be the signature of this method, and what would its behavior be?
release will be 1.0 alpha 1,
I think "alpha" has the wrong semantics here. This is much more than alpha
code; I think it should be 1.0rc1.
I think alpha and beta have been seriously debased in the last fifteen years or so, and I'm trying to fight back. :-) To my way of thinking alpha 1 is feature complete. Beta 1 is free of all known bugs, and the release candidate has all documents and supporting material in place.
I'm going to run through the problems you noted in the JavaDoc. The rest of it I'll have to come back to in a little while.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo AT metalab.unc.edu
Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
-
[XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
jcowan, 02/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call, dirk bergstrom, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
jcowan, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call, John Cowan, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
Bradley S. Huffman, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
John Cowan, 02/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call, Bradley S. Huffman, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
John Cowan, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/02/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
jcowan, 02/02/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call, Bill de hÓra, 02/02/2004
-
[XOM-interest] Put methods,
Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/05/2004
- Re: [XOM-interest] Put methods, jcowan, 02/05/2004
- [XOM-interest] hasChildren vs. getChildCount == 0, Elliotte Rusty Harold, 02/05/2004
-
Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call,
jcowan, 02/02/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.