XOM API for Processing XML with Java

[Janek Bogucki <janekdb AT yahoo.co.uk>]

 --- Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu> wrote:
> I sort of like hasChildren(), but when I marked it package protected 
> in the code, hardly anything broke except a few unit tests that were 
> testing hasChildren(). None of the samples broke, which is telling. 
> Therefore I'm leaning toward removing it. If anyone wants to argue in 
> favor of keeping hasChildren(), speak up now. In fact, if you have an 
> opinion either way, let me know. Whose in favor of hasChildren, and 
> who thinks it should go? The question on the table is whether we 
> should delete hasChildren. Vote now.
> 

+1 to remove hasChildren().

-Janek


        
        
                
___________________________________________________________
BT Yahoo! Broadband - Free modem offer, sign up online today and save £80 
http://btyahoo.yahoo.co.uk