xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: XOM API for Processing XML with Java

List archive

Re: [XOM-interest] hasChildren vs. getChildCount == 0

From: Dirk Bergstrom <dirk AT juniper.net>
To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo AT metalab.unc.edu>
Cc: xom-interest AT lists.ibiblio.org, jcowan AT reutershealth.com
Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] hasChildren vs. getChildCount == 0
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 10:20:29 -0800

On 2004-02-05 04:18, i claim that Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> Therefore I'm leaning toward removing it. If anyone wants to argue in
> favor of keeping hasChildren(), speak up now. In fact, if you have an
> opinion either way, let me know. Whose in favor of hasChildren, and
> who thinks it should go? The question on the table is whether we
> should delete hasChildren. Vote now.

I'm using it in one place, but it would be easy to change to childCount == 0.

--
Dirk Bergstrom dirk AT juniper.net
Computer Geek v: 408.745.3182
Juniper Networks Inc. f: 408.745.8905

Re: [XOM-interest] XOM 1.0d23 Last Call , (continued)