sm-spell-submit AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Submit list for new spells
List archive
- From: "Derber, Geoffrey" <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.Edu>
- To: "'nealbirch '" <nealbirch AT attbi.com>, "'Andrew Stitt '" <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- Cc: "'sm-spell-submit AT lists.ibiblio.org '" <sm-spell-submit AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [SM-Spell-Submit]New Spell: nethack [games]
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:40:33 -0500
So am I supposed to include this in my section (z-rejected), or should we
wait on the games section maintainer?
Geoff
-----Original Message-----
From: nealbirch
To: Andrew Stitt
Cc: sm-spell-submit AT lists.ibiblio.org
Sent: 7/31/02 4:33 PM
Subject: [SM-Spell-Submit]New Spell: nethack [games]
Andrew Stitt wrote:
> this is precompiled binary version of nethack, there exists a source
> tarball but ive yet to figure out how to build it.
Hey buster, I wrote it and it never got in the grimoire.... here it is
again. All spiffy and everything, even works with gcc-3.1!
--
"You can fool some of the people all of the time
--and those are the ones you have to concentrate on!"
GW Bush-- from the N.Y. Times
<<nethack.tar.bz2>>
-
RE: [SM-Spell-Submit]New Spell: nethack [games],
Derber, Geoffrey, 07/31/2002
-
Re: [SM-Spell-Submit]New Spell: nethack [games],
nealbirch, 07/31/2002
-
Re: [SM-Spell-Submit]New Spell: nethack [games],
bluebird, 07/31/2002
-
Re: [SM-Spell-Submit]New Spell: nethack [games],
nealbirch, 07/31/2002
- Re: [SM-Spell-Submit]New Spell: nethack [games], bluebird, 07/31/2002
-
Re: [SM-Spell-Submit]New Spell: nethack [games],
nealbirch, 07/31/2002
-
Re: [SM-Spell-Submit]New Spell: nethack [games],
bluebird, 07/31/2002
-
Re: [SM-Spell-Submit]New Spell: nethack [games],
nealbirch, 07/31/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.