sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>
- To: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- Cc: SM Sorcery <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:01:50 -0600 (CST)
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Casey Harkins <charkins AT upl.cs.wisc.edu>:
> > Forgot to list these spells. This is the list from stable that references
> > SOURCE_DIRECTORY in POST_INSTALL:
> >
> > epsutil
> > gcc
> > gcc2
> > glibc
> > magicfilter2
> > openoffice
> > speedtouch
> > texinfo
> > xdirectfb
> > xfree86
> > xfree86-devel
> > xfree86-libs
> >
> >
> > Most of these only reference $SOURCE_DIRECTORY to remove it. The only two
> > exceptions are speedtouch and texinfo. speedtouch offers to view the
> > howto
> > from SOURCE_DIRECTORY, however it should be available in
> > /usr/share/doc/speedtouch (at least the POST_INSTALL says so if the user
> > opts not to view it then). texinfo uses the SOURCE_DIRECTORY to store
> > some
> > temporary files for generating a list of info files, this could easily be
> > done in /tmp.
>
> I believe that all files a spell needs to create temporarily should reside
> in
> $SOURCE_DIRECTORY only, otherwise people cannot cleanly remove a failed
> compile
> by just removing $SOURCE_DIRECTORY. Correct me if you think this idea is
> bad.
> ;)
>
> -sandalle
>
Nope, that does sound reasonable. I'd suggest moving these operations that
your SOURCE_DIRECTORY to POST_BUILD, but if changes are still tracked
there, we don't want to be tracking anything in SOURCE_DIRECTORY. Another
possibility would be yet another script, POST_CONFIGURE or something that
would do the other stuff that should be done upon resurrecting.
-casey
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Eric Schabell, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Eric Sandall, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Jason Flatt, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Casey Harkins, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Casey Harkins, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Hamish Greig, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Eric Sandall, 03/11/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Casey Harkins, 03/11/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Jason Flatt, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Hamish Greig, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Eric Sandall, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Eric Schabell, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Hamish Greig, 03/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/13/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/14/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/13/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/13/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.