sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: SM Sorcery <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 17:44:15 -0800
>
> If it's truly backwards compatible (which it sounds like it is) I see no
> reason
> not to try it as cleanup is our goal, and it sounds like this would do some
> cleanup (separating some of the libraries into lib files) along with fixing
> a
> few of the filed bugs.
Its totally backwards compatible. The code looks for INSTALL or COMPILE, and
if they exist follows the new behavior, otherwise it reverts to the old.
One issue is that POST_BUILD and POST_INSTALL are now both run after
INSTALL (which is the last half of BUILD). This presents a slight
inconsistancy, as POST_INSTALL now runs after POST_BUILD rather than
immediatly after INSTALL like one would thing. So a global renaming
of all the POST_BUILD/POST_INSTALL files might be in order. But theres
certainly no reason to not allow that file to still work during a
transition period (just as with BUILD). Does that make sense?
What should POST_BUILD be renamed to? Or should we leave it with its
contradictory name?
-Andrew
--
________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt | astitt AT sourcemage.org |
|irc: afrayedknot | afrayedknot AT t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus | |
|Grimoire Guru ham/smgl, Porting Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com |
|Author and Maintainer of Prometheus | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
[SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Robin Cook, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Eric Schabell, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Eric Sandall, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Jason Flatt, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Casey Harkins, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Casey Harkins, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Hamish Greig, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Eric Sandall, 03/11/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Casey Harkins, 03/11/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Jason Flatt, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Hamish Greig, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Eric Sandall, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Eric Schabell, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Robin Cook, 03/10/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.