sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
- From: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
- To: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- Cc: SM Sorcery <sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:21:28 -0600
Can't seem to find a bug 6821 did you mean 6281?
Though this seems to me to be more of an enhancement than a bugfix as
you would have to add features to cast to be able to pick up at a failed
point and continue on.
Thought we agreed at the meeting that only bug fixes for sorcery 1.9?
Not that I don't think this is a good idea because I think it would be a
great additional feature.
CuZnDragon
Robin Cook
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 23:32, Andrew wrote:
> Some of you may have noticed the traffic on bug 6821. I've hijacked
> this bug to further my desire to split up BUILD to its logical pieces,
> COMPILE and INSTALL. I've submitted some patches that accomplish the
> task and written a design doc about it [1]. I've also gone ahead and
> applied the changes to my local perforce client. Changes are just waiting
> to be submitted.
>
> A few issues come up here, first of all there is a POST_BUILD script,
> and a POST_INSTALL script which run in sequence after BUILD finishes,
> of course with my latest changes POST_BUILD runs after INSTALL and
> POST_INSTALL runs after that, perhaps we should rename POST_BUILD
> something more useful, or rename POST_INSTALL something else? Thoughts?
>
> The final goal of all this is make a new sorcery script that lets the
> user run any given spell script by itself (outside of the dependency
> mechanism), allowing the user to have more fine-tuned and lower level
> control over the casting process. The wiki page details the basic idea
> behind this script. I've named the script mutter, does anyone have a
> better name? Other thoughts?
>
> And of course another thing that has to happen in order to make mutter
> is to move a bunch of the functions from cast into a new library (say
> libcast). Any objections to me doing this?
>
> [1] http://wiki.sourcemage.org/index.php?page=BUILD+split+design+doc
-
[SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Robin Cook, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Eric Schabell, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Eric Sandall, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Jason Flatt, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Casey Harkins, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Casey Harkins, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Hamish Greig, 03/10/2004
- Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD, Eric Sandall, 03/11/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Jason Flatt, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Eric Sandall, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Andrew, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Eric Schabell, 03/10/2004
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery] splitting BUILD,
Robin Cook, 03/10/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.