sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly
- From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: Seth Woolley <seth AT tautology.org>
- Cc: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly
- Date: 02 Nov 2002 13:43:32 -0500
This was fixed last night to use --bzip. There is a contradiction in the
tar --help and man tar. --help suggests --bzip2, while man suggests
--bzip. --bzip works, but those with old versions of tar should keep an
eye out in cast this is a recent change.
For some reason tar used to be patched to use the older -y... I found it
annoying to have to use -y on one box and -j on another.
On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 04:09, Seth Woolley wrote:
> Might want to use --bzip2 instead of -j or j.
> just in case you want to downgrade tar or have it work in both version.
>
> why would they change such a thing anyways?
>
> Seth
>
> On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
>
> > Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 09:43:33 +0100
> > From: Treeve Jelbert <treeve01 AT pi.be>
> > To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly
> >
> > On Saturday 02 November 2002 09:30, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> > > On Saturday 02 November 2002 09:09, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> > > > I've just encountered the following problem, using the latest stable
> > > > sorcery
> > > >
> > > > Could this be related to the new tar flags?
> > >
> > > I've now found the bug. It's in scribe.
> > >
> > > there are two instances of 'tar xyvf' which should be 'tar xyjf'
> > >
> > > scribe works correctly after I changed it.
> > I meant 'tar xvjf'
> > --
> > Regards, Treeve
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Sorcery mailing list
> > SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
-----------------
PGP public key at
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3327A9A5
F1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Seth Woolley, 11/02/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly, Ryan Abrams, 11/02/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly, Dufflebunk, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Seth Woolley, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.