sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly
- From: Treeve Jelbert <treeve01 AT pi.be>
- To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly
- Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 09:30:21 +0100
On Saturday 02 November 2002 09:09, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> I've just encountered the following problem, using the latest stable
> sorcery
>
> Could this be related to the new tar flags?
I've now found the bug. It's in scribe.
there are two instances of 'tar xyvf' which should be 'tar xyjf'
scribe works correctly after I changed it.
--
Regards, Treeve
-
[SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Seth Woolley, 11/02/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly, Ryan Abrams, 11/02/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly, Dufflebunk, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Seth Woolley, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.