sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly
- From: Treeve Jelbert <treeve01 AT pi.be>
- To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly
- Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 09:43:33 +0100
On Saturday 02 November 2002 09:30, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> On Saturday 02 November 2002 09:09, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> > I've just encountered the following problem, using the latest stable
> > sorcery
> >
> > Could this be related to the new tar flags?
>
> I've now found the bug. It's in scribe.
>
> there are two instances of 'tar xyvf' which should be 'tar xyjf'
>
> scribe works correctly after I changed it.
I meant 'tar xvjf'
--
Regards, Treeve
-
[SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Seth Woolley, 11/02/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly, Ryan Abrams, 11/02/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly, Dufflebunk, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Seth Woolley, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.