Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-sorcery - Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly

sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Seth Woolley <seth AT tautology.org>
  • To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Cc: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly
  • Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 01:09:28 -0800 (PST)

Might want to use --bzip2 instead of -j or j.
just in case you want to downgrade tar or have it work in both version.

why would they change such a thing anyways?

Seth

On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Treeve Jelbert wrote:

> Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 09:43:33 +0100
> From: Treeve Jelbert <treeve01 AT pi.be>
> To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly
>
> On Saturday 02 November 2002 09:30, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> > On Saturday 02 November 2002 09:09, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> > > I've just encountered the following problem, using the latest stable
> > > sorcery
> > >
> > > Could this be related to the new tar flags?
> >
> > I've now found the bug. It's in scribe.
> >
> > there are two instances of 'tar xyvf' which should be 'tar xyjf'
> >
> > scribe works correctly after I changed it.
> I meant 'tar xvjf'
> --
> Regards, Treeve
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Sorcery mailing list
> SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
>
>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page