Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-sorcery - Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly

sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
  • To: Seth Woolley <seth AT tautology.org>
  • Cc: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly
  • Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 11:32:52 -0600

Just looked, and This is fixed in cvs already.

-Ryan

On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 03:09 AM, Seth Woolley wrote:

Might want to use --bzip2 instead of -j or j.
just in case you want to downgrade tar or have it work in both version.

why would they change such a thing anyways?

Seth

On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Treeve Jelbert wrote:

Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 09:43:33 +0100
From: Treeve Jelbert <treeve01 AT pi.be>
To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly

On Saturday 02 November 2002 09:30, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
On Saturday 02 November 2002 09:09, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
I've just encountered the following problem, using the latest stable
sorcery

Could this be related to the new tar flags?

I've now found the bug. It's in scribe.

there are two instances of 'tar xyvf' which should be 'tar xyjf'

scribe works correctly after I changed it.
I meant 'tar xvjf'
--
Regards, Treeve
_______________________________________________
SM-Sorcery mailing list
SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery



_______________________________________________
SM-Sorcery mailing list
SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page