sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Sorcery related topics
List archive
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly
- From: Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
- To: Seth Woolley <seth AT tautology.org>
- Cc: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly
- Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 11:32:52 -0600
Just looked, and This is fixed in cvs already.
-Ryan
On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 03:09 AM, Seth Woolley wrote:
Might want to use --bzip2 instead of -j or j.
just in case you want to downgrade tar or have it work in both version.
why would they change such a thing anyways?
Seth
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 09:43:33 +0100
From: Treeve Jelbert <treeve01 AT pi.be>
To: sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly
On Saturday 02 November 2002 09:30, Treeve Jelbert wrote:
On Saturday 02 November 2002 09:09, Treeve Jelbert wrote:I meant 'tar xvjf'
I've just encountered the following problem, using the latest stable
sorcery
Could this be related to the new tar flags?
I've now found the bug. It's in scribe.
there are two instances of 'tar xyvf' which should be 'tar xyjf'
scribe works correctly after I changed it.
--
Regards, Treeve
_______________________________________________
SM-Sorcery mailing list
SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
_______________________________________________
SM-Sorcery mailing list
SM-Sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-sorcery
-
[SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Seth Woolley, 11/02/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly, Ryan Abrams, 11/02/2002
- Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly, Dufflebunk, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Seth Woolley, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
-
Re: [SM-Sorcery]Grimoire tarball for devel not formated correctly,
Treeve Jelbert, 11/02/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.