sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:53:50 +1100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 05:58, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> I would like to express my objection to proliferation of *-cvs spells in
> the grimoire. I don't like selecting between a normal and *-cvs spell,
> instead I'd like to cast just one spell and be prompted whether I want
> release or cvs version. *-cvs spells that are needed by other spells
> must carry PROVIDES and incur additional maintenance. In my sections,
> the only spells similar to *-cvs are php-dev and httpd-dev, which are
> still maintained for historical reasons, and php-dev is probably long
> overdue for deletion because nobody uses it, even I (we might need a
> php5 spell, but not php-dev).
> Another example is the GIMP spells, stable and devel. I'd like to have
> just one gimp, and choose my options during the first cast. If I'm not
> happy, I can "cast -r" and get a prompt again.
> Above all, I think it's less work to write CONFIGURE/PREPARE once,
> rewrite DETAILS/BUILD if necessary, and be done, rather than maintain
> hordes of *-cvs spells.
> I'd appreciate everyone's comment on this.
> Thank you!
>
> Sergey.
In general I agree.
Often creating a -cvs spell to test the latest and greatest from some project
is the quickest thing to do, but longterm leads to maintenance issues and
grimoire bloating.
I would much rather see a single spell with a configure choice than a second
*-cvs spell that conflicts etc.
I have only 4 or so cvs spells in games and plan to integrate them into the
regular spell when more pressing bugs have been fixed.
Some projects depends/requirements differ in their cvs version and these
spells should be the exception to the general rule. A versioning issue like
MPlayer-cvs working with only ffmpeg-cvs is probably the only valid reason to
make a seperate -cvs spell
The single proviso is that a *conbination* release/cvs spell must work out of
the box for both choices.
Hamish
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/0/XU8fSufZR6424RAvxoAKCAkzNZHT1b+LX8aklc9CXgzrUyZwCghIli
BbMysK3xOs32zPRM/sXWorE=
=JOPw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 12/07/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 12/07/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells, Paul Mahon, 12/07/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells,
Andrew, 12/07/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells, Robert Figura, 12/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells,
Duane Malcolm, 12/08/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells, Andrew, 12/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells,
Hamish Greig, 12/07/2003
- Re: [smgl] Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells, Treeve Jelbert, 12/08/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells, Arwed von Merkatz, 12/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 12/08/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells, Ladislav Hagara, 12/08/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells,
evraire, 12/07/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells, Bearcat M. Sandor, 12/07/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells(poll), Bearcat M. Sandor, 12/07/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells,
Duane Malcolm, 12/07/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells,
Paul Mahon, 12/07/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells, Robin Cook, 12/07/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] proliferation of *-cvs spells,
Paul Mahon, 12/07/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.