sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?
- From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- Cc: Source Mage - Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 22:03:52 -0000
Although the sorcery team is much smaller, I can tell you one thing that
might be bad. If there are no assigned sections, I have a tendency to
just pick the interesting bugs and assume someone else (no names ;) will
take care of the plethora of others.
With no assigned sections, you can't take pride in having your section
bug free, and no incentive to fix those last few annoying bugs in a
section.
OTOH, it's easier to manage and if you get the itch you can really clean
up.
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 17:37, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been thinking (yeah, yeah, I know, bad idea Eric) and I've noticed
> that we have less gurus now than before, with some gurus handling several
> sections at once with other people wanting to add sections (to help lessen
> the number of packages in a section among other reasons). I'd like to see
> what you think of removing guruship for specific sections, setting up a
> list (bugs AT sourcemage.org) which bugzilla sends all NEW bug reports to,
> then any guru can go and assign the bug to him/herself. This way our
> grimoire is more "open" for people to help out in and then we don't have
> sections that are listed as "unmaintained", which not only looks bad, but
> is bad in practice.
>
> Thoughts? Flames? Constructive critisism?
>
> -sandalle
-
[SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Andrew, 06/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?, Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Dufflebunk, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?, Seth Woolley, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Dufflebunk, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Andrew, 06/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?, Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Andrew, 06/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?, Eric Womack, 06/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?, Seth Woolley, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?,
Andrew, 06/10/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.