Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
  • To: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
  • Cc: Source Mage - Grimoire <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire] Section-based Gurus Becoming Difficult?
  • Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 22:06:31 -0000

Everyone in the sorcery team (or at least zero and I) receive all diffs
to the sorcery side of things. So long as someone is checking them all,
there's no problem (I do check them all). However, I don't know how big
a job that would be for the grimoire.

On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 17:43, Andrew wrote:
> "its about time"
>
> theres always the perforce/cvs problem. Although given enough
> communication about who is doing what, it wont be a problem.
>
> One issue I have though, is security, theres not much to stop a script
> kiddie from asking to be a guru, then making some spell do rm -rf /. How
> do we catch things like that? do we need a more stringent peer review
> process.
>
> Just my thoughts.
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:37:03PM -0700, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been thinking (yeah, yeah, I know, bad idea Eric) and I've noticed
> > that we have less gurus now than before, with some gurus handling several
> > sections at once with other people wanting to add sections (to help lessen
> > the number of packages in a section among other reasons). I'd like to see
> > what you think of removing guruship for specific sections, setting up a
> > list (bugs AT sourcemage.org) which bugzilla sends all NEW bug reports to,
> > then any guru can go and assign the bug to him/herself. This way our
> > grimoire is more "open" for people to help out in and then we don't have
> > sections that are listed as "unmaintained", which not only looks bad, but
> > is bad in practice.
> >
> > Thoughts? Flames? Constructive critisism?
> >
> > -sandalle
> >
> > --
> > PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
> > http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
> >
> > Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> > eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
> > http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
> > http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Grimoire mailing list
> > SM-Grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-grimoire
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Grimoire mailing list
> SM-Grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-grimoire





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page