sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Jeremy A Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
- To: Andrew Stitt <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- Cc: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells
- Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 14:40:39 -0400 (EDT)
I am a little out of shape when it comes to this stuff, but I will help in
any way that I can. I've noticed that a lot of spell updates are just
version bumps, and those are pretty easy to deal with.
Jeremy
Quoting Andrew Stitt <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>:
> > Now, if we do open up the grimoire (not to just anyone, but other
> GGs),
> > then how will we determine who's doing what? If it's a bug in
> bugzilla,
> > they can just reassign it to themselves, but what about spell
> submissions
> > to sm-spell-submit? I say that before a GG takes on a wayward
> spell from
> > sm-spell-submit that they first send a message with the subject
> starting
> > as "ITP: <spellname>", with ITP meaning "Intent To
> Program/Publish"
> > (similar to Debian's sytem), this way it will not be
> duplicated.
>
> this was something i think i meant to say but forgot, and its a
> great idea
> that way unless someone isnt watching no one duplicates each others
> work.
>
> >
> > I also agree with you, Andrew, that we need more spells (though
> this will
> > increase the load on the current maintainers) as we don't really
> have that
> > many. Some sections have fewer than 25 spells (though others
> have close
> > to 100).
>
> about how many maintainers do we have? maybe we should ask for
> volunteers?
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Grimoire mailing list
> SM-Grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-grimoire
>
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Andrew Stitt, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Eric Sandall, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Ryan Abrams, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Andrew Stitt, 09/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells, Eric Sandall, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Eric Sandall, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Dufflebunk, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Eric Sandall, 09/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells, Andrew Stitt, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Eric Sandall, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Dufflebunk, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Andrew Stitt, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Andrew Stitt, 09/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells, Jeremy A Kolb, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Jonathan Evraire, 09/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells, Eric Sandall, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Andrew Stitt, 09/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells, Ryan Abrams, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Jeremy Kolb, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Seth Woolley, 09/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells, Andrew Stitt, 09/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells, Ryan Abrams, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Seth Woolley, 09/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Ryan Abrams, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Eric Sandall, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Jeremy A Kolb, 09/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells, Eric Sandall, 09/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]Unfiled spells,
Andrew Stitt, 09/06/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.