sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items
List archive
- From: Mads Laursen <dossen+sgl AT daimi.au.dk>
- To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 00:18:35 +0200
On 06/08/02 13.47, Eric Sandall wrote:
> This is why, if we can't agree on using only one SCM, we need to sync in
> both directions with CVS and Perforce, that way it will not matter which
> SCM the helper/guru uses as it will soon be synced with the other.
>
I'm just talking out a certain bodypart, but doesn't cvs support some
sort of triggered actions (scripts executed pre-/post-commit)? If so
(and p4 has similar features) maybe some kind of system could be put
together to sync the changes as they happen?
Maybe it would be impossible to do, but a man can dream...
/dossen
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/05/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Ryan Abrams, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Eric Sandall, 08/05/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/05/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Jason Flatt, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Eric Sandall, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Laurent Wandrebeck, 08/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/06/2002
-
RE: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Derber, Geoffrey, 08/06/2002
-
RE: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Eric Sandall, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Mads Laursen, 08/06/2002
-
RE: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Eric Sandall, 08/06/2002
- RE: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Derber, Geoffrey, 08/06/2002
-
RE: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Derber, Geoffrey, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Andrew Stitt, 08/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce, Derber, Geoffrey, 08/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/05/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.