Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-grimoire - RE: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce

sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Discussion of Spells and Grimoire items

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Derber, Geoffrey" <Geoffrey.Derber AT Trinity.Edu>
  • To: "'Andrew Stitt '" <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>, "'sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org '" <sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce
  • Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 17:19:05 -0500

The only problem I see with that particular solution, is if a section
maintainer goes on vacation, others might not as easily be able to quickly
help out with that section for the time the maintainer is gone.

For example:
Section Maintainer x uses CVS in their section
Section Maintainer y uses p4 in their section

If section maintainer x goes on vacation, section maintainer y would have a
more difficult time helping out maintainer x.

Also, similarly if we do decide to not limit the maintainers as much, so the
ones who are more active can help out those who are less active.

So in general this method makes it a bit more difficult for people to
maintain across sections, when necissary.

Geoff

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Stitt
To: sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
Sent: 8/6/02 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: [SM-Grimoire]CVS or Perforce
<snip>

so if each maintainer chooses the scm they want for their
section there are no more syncing problems

<snip>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page